The objective form is required before we can objectively express anything of our subjective knowing!
An independent observer with objective perspective is required because pure subjective sensing and our “knowing ” realizations can only be perceived, they can NOT be expressed while we hold them in their subjective form.
We can not simply pass our feelings or knowing to another. To express feelings, we must use objects our intended target has previously related to the feeling we want expressed. Then, as we refer to that object again, they hopefully relate to it and subjectively identify with our expression.
Before the first expression was ever made, we had to adopt a common set of objects for representing our subjective sensings and knowings. This we did in mass as each of us agreed upon sharing a common physical reality.
We share a common reality so we can creatively express ourselves to the fullest extend of the potential value fulfillment we hoped expression would reveal.
We now express ourselves so often that when we switch perspective, we are hardly conscious of the transition we make from knowing to employing mental constructs during expression. Expression has become so natural, we have long ago forgotten the rules we agreed upon in choosing the objects we would use for expression.
In making our choices of the symbols to mentally construct for use in our objective expressions, we identified certain core characteristics as foundational. We agreed every construct would have certain characteristics of relationship as they were defined.
Unique to each choice was the requisite that all objects within reality would have a basis founded upon time and space (locality) while also being within a sequence dependant relationship of cause and effect (causality) .
A focus upon Value fulfillment
I feel we chose cause and effect causality to represent or correlate our actions with the subjective changes our being observes and realizes in recognizing incremental changes of value fulfillment.
Identity is a part of action, and basically inseparable from action. Identity attempts to form meaningful patters and relationships from action. Consciousness is action that perceives itself, The ego is action’s attempt to stand off from itself.
Identities, some identities and some forms of consciousness, particularly the ego, perceive a past or a present, but this is merely the result of the manner in which identities and consciousness view available data.
A consciousness is characterized by the particular ways in which it views or perceives available action. It is characterized by the type of action which it is more likely to perceive. It is characterized by the pattern of perception itself.
Since action is not apart from structure, but is indeed the formulator of structure, then it is obvious that generally the type, nature, extent and scope of characteristic perception patterns of a consciousness will determine its physical structure, and not the other way around. Seth ES3-Session 141 Pg 298
While in actuality observation, recognition and realization occur within the same timeless action, for purposes of creative expression, we create our mental constructs projecting imagined spaces or gaps we call time into the observing/recognizing/realization event (Seth’s value fulfillment action) as we objectify the action. By injecting imaginary “time spaces” we identify before and after realization states which are objectified individually as before and after objects related together in space-time sequenced and cause-effect sequenced relationships. With mental constructs so defined, we have developed a rich set of objects to relate to almost every feeling and knowing we subjectively acquire.
Paradox – a dilemma regarding origin
As useful as such objects are for expression, the objects fail to be useful when we attempt expressing characteristics about them from the perspective of viewing them as a whole.
As the objects of expression were mentally constructed into sequenced locality and causality relationships, the inclusion of our core relationships introduced insurmountable dilemmas of contradiction. The act of mentally constructing objects with sequenced causality relationship creates a perception paradox; a logical contradiction; a dilemma regarding origin.
Which comes first,
the chicken or the egg,
the dog or the pup,
the father or the child,
the vision or the man ?
The paradox rages to this day for the conundrum exists with every object existing within physical reality.
The most important paradoxical question regarding origin is: Which comes first?
- Subjective reality wherein physical reality is perceived as sensed and known, or
- Physical reality that must be perceived subjectively before it can be sensed or known.
For me, I have decided:
A subjective vision of a man came before there was a man beholding a vision.
It seems to me that if objective reality has insurmountable problems and requires a subjective perception before it can even be observed. And, if an understanding of subjective reality resolves the insurmountable problems of the objective, then it should be intuitively obvious that subjective reality is the foundation from where the objective is projected and then observed.
In conclusion, I feel to state with assured confidence:
That’s my reality and I am sticking with it!
BelieveIt 2 RealizeIt