{"id":35,"date":"2010-01-23T10:41:02","date_gmt":"2010-01-23T17:41:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/believeit.us\/?p=35"},"modified":"2010-01-24T14:14:19","modified_gmt":"2010-01-24T21:14:19","slug":"all-that-is","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/believeit.us\/?p=35","title":{"rendered":"All that Is"},"content":{"rendered":"

To commence with a little discovery fun, I’ll put forth a Premise:\u00a0 We are part of an infinitely expanding collection of multidimensional thoughts.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Mere Intention to Receive, and\u00a0one does<\/strong><\/p>\n

If a thoughtful thinker gives but a little focus to the above premise, a thought reaction can be expected to follow.\u00a0 It will!\u00a0 It aways does. The proof that a new thought is attracted requires but the least amount of attentive focus and a most intuitively obvious realization\u00a0or thought is received.\u00a0 It is the law!<\/p>\n

Thought begets thought. The thoughtful (focusing) thinker might likely attract or compose a series of questioning thoughts, if desire is sufficient to muster but a little attention.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Thoughts of interest come without effort. The mere decision to focus\u00a0with<\/strong> a “detail seeking intention”, \u00a0<\/strong>or having a thoughtful dispositon,<\/strong>\u00a0and many related thoughts, ideas and detail can be\u00a0perceived. Indeed, thinking <\/strong>is the easiest thing we do. Nothing is more natural because the law of attraction always brings more thoughts to every thought provoking thought. It\u00a0is the nature of all that is.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Every thought we create with the intention\u00a0of considering details is granted the receiving of detail discerning thought. It is: Ask and you shall receive; seek and ye shall find.<\/p>\n

In deed, as detail intending thoughts go, such thoughts may be more accurately described as provocative\u00a0intentions <\/strong>or mere intention.\u00a0<\/strong>The mere intention to receive, and one does.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The thinker behind the thought<\/strong><\/p>\n

Where ever \u00a0we find a collection of thoughts, we must also find a creative thinker behind them. \u00a0The supposition reminds one of a common riddle posed to school children: Which came first, the chicken or the egg?\u00a0 One must not get the cart before the horse or things won’t work the same.<\/p>\n

All of these thoughts are related to the premise above presented.\u00a0 With a little more thought and larger view of reality, it might be realized:\u00a0 If all physical objects were first thoughts before they were manifest physically, then the chicken or the egg paradox is more easily resolved.<\/p>\n

Perspective makes a difference.
\nThought preceeds identification of physical objects<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n

If one realizes that thought precedes all objective identification, then it is easy to imagine that they could have been recognized co-existing psychically in thought before they simultaneously appeared physically.\u00a0<\/p>\n

That both were created at the same time seems a\u00a0simple and intuitive possibility once one has the perspective, realization\u00a0or belief that:\u00a0 thought always precedes object identification. From there the realization follows: It may plasibly be the same with physical creation within our universe, especially when one considers the discoveries of Quantum physics\u00a0and the effects of consciousness in the\u00a0observation of matter.\u00a0<\/p>\n

The Quantum Measurment Problem<\/strong><\/p>\n

Quantum physicists do NOT so much as believe consciousness forms material objects\u00a0as that they have come to conclude and realize (Believe as Reality):\u00a0consciousness affects their attempts to observe how quantum objects behave; whether they behave as energy or matter.\u00a0 But from my perspective, that’s saying the same thing.<\/p>\n

Quantum physics has ingeniously discovered that they can observe quantum particals\u00a0before and after they appear objectively as particals of matter.\u00a0 In this they recognize the only variable affecting the changes they observe is their very\u00a0attempt to observe. That is; the introduction of a conscious observer in mid stream changed the behavior observed in the end.\u00a0\u00a0 The introduction of a conscious\u00a0observer causes quanta to act objectively. Remove the mid-stream conscious observing and end results show non-object behavior.<\/p>\n

All that is known was first thought.\u00a0 It is also, last of all – Thought!\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

While we may see an object with our eyes and believe we are observing the\u00a0object physically, All that is\u00a0 must be perceived and all that is perceived is in fact ONLY perceived through thought.\u00a0 It is always thought because whether we are\u00a0visually viewing a physical object or mentally viewing it with our eyes closed, the perception of any object is always still perception – a mental function.\u00a0 Objective perception is but the conscious mental recognition of an object in thought.\u00a0 All that is known to be real is first and last – always thought.<\/p>\n

Whether our perception is of something physically in view or not. Perception, awareness and consciousness are the attributes of the thinker and not the attributes of the physical object.\u00a0 All physical experiences begin and end with psychic or mental\u00a0perception.\u00a0 No physical object is experienced until the <\/strong>reality of it’s existence\u00a0is first concluded or formed in thought.\u00a0 Quantum Physics consistently demonstrates this scientifically even though physicists can NOT explain why or how.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

To commence with a little discovery fun, I’ll put forth a Premise:\u00a0 We are part of an infinitely expanding collection of multidimensional thoughts. Mere Intention to Receive, and\u00a0one does If a thoughtful thinker gives but a little focus to the above premise, a thought reaction can be expected to follow.\u00a0 It will!\u00a0 It aways does. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-beliefs-form-reality"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/believeit.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/believeit.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/believeit.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/believeit.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/believeit.us\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=35"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/believeit.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":57,"href":"https:\/\/believeit.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35\/revisions\/57"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/believeit.us\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=35"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/believeit.us\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=35"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/believeit.us\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=35"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}