{"id":1961,"date":"2016-06-11T22:40:13","date_gmt":"2016-06-12T04:40:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/believeit.us\/?p=1961"},"modified":"2016-07-03T21:20:15","modified_gmt":"2016-07-04T03:20:15","slug":"the-dilemma-of-expression","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/believeit.us\/?p=1961","title":{"rendered":"The Dilemma of Expression"},"content":{"rendered":"

Within the dilemma of expression we find the origin of objective reality.<\/strong><\/p>\n

We have a dilemma. When we wish to\u00a0accurately express an experienced event, desire as we may, a purely subjective experience can not\u00a0be purposefully conveyed to another in its purely subjective form.<\/p>\n

Under normal circumstances, others can only sense the thoughts or sensing of another by their first having a\u00a0sympathetic desire<\/em><\/strong> to receive the same. Sympathetic desire acts as\u00a0an invitation attracting all that are like it. Sympathetic desire forms what is\u00a0called our\u00a0emotional climate. <\/em><\/strong>There must\u00a0be\u00a0a sympathetic recipient before the subjective experience of another can be perceived by a recipient.<\/p>\n

The dilemma of expression is then: how can\u00a0we initiate communication so that a recipient gets into the sympathetic disposition of receiving our desired communication? How can we express the subjective essence of our unique individual selves so that we share our\u00a0most\u00a0rich and valued discoveries of creativity?<\/p>\n

We may have heard that\u00a0some subjective feelings are\u00a0communicated by way of empathy. However, empathy is again a perception ability on part of the empath not\u00a0a communication skill available to a\u00a0communicator desiring to expressly\u00a0communicate.<\/p>\n

In ES3-121<\/a> Seth explains that telepathy is an attracted sensing. Similar to\u00a0thinking, the recipient must first have a common sympathy or interest before they can encompass and perceive the thoughts or subjective sensing of\u00a0another.<\/p>\n

We address the\u00a0dilemma of expression\u00a0by changing the form in which\u00a0we express ourselves. We begin\u00a0by adapting the use of objects to accomplish that end. \u00a0First we mentally construct objects of form and characteristics\u00a0that we can\u00a0refer to as symbolically representing our\u00a0subjectively recognized sensings.<\/p>\n

We do the same as we assign sounds or words that we agree refer to the object characteristic referencing the subjective event we want expressed. We form\u00a0words into\u00a0language and use them to symbolize the object universe. Languages then facilitate and extend our ability to creatively express.<\/p>\n

The\u00a0spoken words of language are\u00a0two steps away from the subjective sensing we want\u00a0expressed. The word represents the object or characteristic that in turn represents the subjective interpretation we have previously agreed it\u00a0expresses.<\/p>\n

The written word is three steps away. \u00a0To further emphasize our common use of symbolic representation in creative expression, we construct words of yet another level of symbols called alphabetic letters and now we can express ourselves in writing.<\/p>\n

At yet another level, we \u00a0construct\u00a0digital characters of\u00a0binary 0’s and 1’s to convey our subjective sensings, ideas, concepts and thoughts. We can now express ourselves in electronic form.<\/p>\n

In the end, all\u00a0objective and symbolic expressions\u00a0convey subjective meaning only if such objective expressions are shared in common between\u00a0the communicator and recipient.<\/p>\n

Expression and communication are\u00a0possible because\u00a0we agree upon what\u00a0objective symbols refer to subjectively. \u00a0Once we\u00a0agree on those meanings, we\u00a0have a universe of symbols that when considered as a whole are\u00a0called reality and the bundle of individual meanings called beliefs.<\/p>\n

Expressed objects or symbols convey no subjective understanding, if\u00a0we don’t\u00a0first agreed upon how such symbols will be\u00a0understood or that\u00a0they’ll\u00a0convey the subjective sensing we want communicated. Communications are ONLY possible because\u00a0we share a common set of symbols previously\u00a0agreed upon as referring to the universal set of subjective sensings or reality.<\/p>\n

In summary: without first transposing our subjective perceptions into symbolic objective form, communication can not\u00a0be\u00a0initiated. We decide upon\u00a0symbolic representation of the subjective before any\u00a0event\u00a0can be communicated or passed on to another. Here again successful communication\u00a0demands that\u00a0our choice of symbols is\u00a0recognized by both communicator and recipient. The symbols we use are immaterial, it is only important that they communicate similar subjective interpretation. Such is true of all mentally constructed realities created to symbolize our only true reality the subjective reality.<\/p>\n

Pushed Perception and Telepathy<\/strong><\/p>\n

The objective behind expression is therefore to “push<\/em><\/strong>” \u00a0the transference of subjective perception to another. While we may at first think we could\u00a0communicate our perception by showing them what we sensed, their is no way of knowing they received it accurately until they provide an expression of their perception back to us as feed back.<\/p>\n

For example: Suppose we desire to\u00a0communicate our sensing of the sun shinning upon our face, Our options for\u00a0communication do NOT permit our making the sun shine upon them nor ensuring they are in the frame of mind required for them to perceive the same\u00a0as\u00a0us.<\/p>\n

We may think we can\u00a0drag them out of their home and into the sun light. But, there is no way to ensure they perceive what we did until they\u00a0use expression to provide or communicate\u00a0feed back.<\/p>\n

In all attempts to communicate perception one to another, we are forced to use\u00a0objective representations to initiate communication. Then to confirm our communications are\u00a0effective, we seek to obtain\u00a0feed back from\u00a0the recipient. With feed back, we have\u00a0a\u00a0desire to obtain the feedback sympathetic to our expressions. In many instances, because our sympathies lie with perceiving the recipients understanding, we do NOT need to receive their objective expressions as we may already be in the\u00a0sympathetic state where we can sense their understanding. Indeed we commonly employ telepathic perception using\u00a0sympathetic expectation in\u00a0obtaining feed back. Such are received like thoughts that we desire to know and expect. They are not pushed to us from a communicative personality, they are attracted and picked up by the recipient because they seek to know.<\/p>\n

Telepathic or sympathetic perception\u00a0can also\u00a0occur with\u00a0an\u00a0initial expression, but the recipient must first be sympathetic of perceiving what we desire\u00a0communicated before we can\u00a0actually perceive their non-expressed subjective sensing. \u00a0An individual can contemplate and desire to share some of the most precious concepts of subjective reality, but until a student is ready, willing and desirous of hearing or knowing the same, it is as if the teacher doesn’t exist. Let the student desire to know and it appears as if a teacher has magically appeared to teach.<\/p>\n

We’ve all experienced failures of communication that occur when a\u00a0recipient is\u00a0NOT focused or interested in receiving our communication. These attempts fail because communications are ONLY successful\u00a0when the recipient is receptive\u00a0and sympathetically desiring to obtain the\u00a0subjective interpretation we want\u00a0to communicate.\u00a0Without a sympathetic desire, no\u00a0recipient or student can be forced to\u00a0perceive what a communicator or teacher\u00a0may desire to\u00a0objectively express.<\/p>\n

In actuality,\u00a0the act of receiving a communication requires mental deconstruction of the objective symbols we used to initiate the communication. \u00a0While use of mental constructs are always required to express ones self. Mental deconstruction into subjective sensing is also\u00a0required to complete the transfer of anything expressed.<\/p>\n

It is our desire to express ourselves and our psychological discoveries that fuels the creation of objective form and I propose the existence of all that exists physically.<\/p>\n

Within the\u00a0Dilemma of Expression we also find the Origins of our Individuality.<\/strong><\/p>\n

There is an even larger dilemma of\u00a0expression that affects the identity of self<\/em><\/strong>.<\/em> These dilemmas fuel changes in our perceptions of reality and our\u00a0identification of self or identity. The self<\/em><\/strong> is\u00a0but a reflection of those\u00a0characteristics within\u00a0reality we identify as personal<\/em><\/strong>. Here again the true self is subjective, the physical body is but a reflected projection of the subjective personality into objective form.<\/p>\n

The dilemma of complete expression<\/strong><\/p>\n

We can never completely express ourselves\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>in precisely the\u00a0way we have it\u00a0conceived. \u00a0With each attempt at expression, the matter is changed from whatever subjective impulse first birthed the value recognizing desire to express it!<\/p>\n

We must never fall sway to the idea, “Since I can’t get it perfect; just as well not try”.<\/p>\n

Yet our every\u00a0expression is never a perfect reproduction of the subjective personal self. In our\u00a0attempts to reconstruct perfectly reflective\u00a0expressions, there is always\u00a0recognition of imperfections and subtle\u00a0differences. With such realizations, we attempt to adjust our objective projections\u00a0to make them more accurate. But with each last projection, in actuality we perceive a change in our personality resulting from that last action. By each such\u00a0simple\u00a0attempt to formulate or mentally construct a\u00a0more perfectly\u00a0reflective expression of ourselves, we expand our conscious awareness of self and our view of reality.<\/p>\n

Within realizations of change expansions\u00a0occur. With each new realizations our realities are\u00a0forever changing and expanding. \u00a0Ever new\u00a0expanding realizations of clarity accompany our every\u00a0attempt to fully express the person that we really are.<\/p>\n

Creative expression is the fuel that propels our eternal growth of insight.\u00a0With each expansion of insight, we are different from the subject we were last trying to express.<\/p>\n

At a minimum every symbol is and requires mental construction to turn the subjective event into a representative symbol. Regardless the best of efforts and detail given to mental construction, such constructions are imperfect reproductions and we find new\u00a0reflections\u00a0within\u00a0the camouflage of the only\u00a0truly complete reality; our\u00a0subjective mind.<\/p>\n

I wonder if the subjective and objective might be the Yin and Yang of eternity. Or, maybe it is the subjective event and our attempt to express it as objective experience that is represented by\u00a0Yin and Yang. Maybe it is our pondering and expression; recognition and realization.<\/p>\n

We will forever enjoy\u00a0forming and reforming our individual\u00a0identities and our personal realities in the process.<\/p>\n

We have need only to: \u00a0BelieveIt 2 RealizeIt!<\/p>\n

Additional Studies on Identity:<\/strong>
\nSeth-ES3-Session121 <\/a>
\nSeth-ES3-Session122 <\/a>
\nSeth-ES3-Session123<\/a>
\nSeth-ES3-Session124-125<\/a>
\nSeth-ES3-Session126 <\/a>
\nSeth-ES3-Session127 <\/a>
\nSeth-ES3-Session128 <\/a>
\nSeth-ES3-Session129 <\/a>
\nSeth-ES3-Session130 <\/a>
\nSeth-ES3-Session131 <\/a>
\nSeth-ES3-Session132 <\/a>
\nSeth-ES3-Session133 <\/a>
\nSeth-ES3-Session134-135<\/a>
\nSeth-ES3-Session136-137<\/a>
\nSeth-ES3-Session138 <\/a>
\nSeth-ES3-Session139-140<\/a>
\nSeth-ES3-Session141 <\/a>
\nSeth-ES3-Session142 <\/a>
\nSeth-ES3-Session143 <\/a>
\nSeth-ES3-Session144 <\/a>
\nSeth-ES3-Session145 <\/a>
\nSeth-ES3-Session146 <\/a>
\nSeth-ES3-Session147-148<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Within the dilemma of expression we find the origin of objective reality. We have a dilemma. When we wish to\u00a0accurately express an experienced event, desire as we may, a purely subjective experience can not\u00a0be purposefully conveyed to another in its purely subjective form. Under normal circumstances, others can only sense the thoughts or sensing of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1961","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-beliefs-form-reality"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/believeit.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1961","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/believeit.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/believeit.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/believeit.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/believeit.us\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1961"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/believeit.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1961\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1975,"href":"https:\/\/believeit.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1961\/revisions\/1975"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/believeit.us\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1961"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/believeit.us\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1961"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/believeit.us\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1961"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}